BY: root

29 October, 2025 Comments (0)

Defamatory Google Reviews: Part 2

Defamatory Google Review: Part 2 As we explored in Defamation & Google reviews: Part 1, positive Google reviews are important to most small to medium sized businesses in Australia. They demonstrate to a potential client that your business provides quality goods and services and can be trusted. It is for that reason that when a negative Google review is received, it can have both negative and disastrous consequences on a small business. Even one review can result in a measurable and noticeable decline in both client inquiries, and consequential revenue. If you believe you have received a Google review which is fake or incorrect and it is having, or could have, a negative effect on your business, it is important you act as soon as possible. What to do if you have received a defamatory or negative google review The First Step The first step is to take photographs or screenshots of the Google review you have concerns about, and where possible, obtain copies of the URL where it can be accessed. This is the type of evidence you will require if you wish to send a notice to the publisher requesting that they remove the Google review, such as a concerns notice; or if you need the assistance of a third party (such as Google themselves), this information will be of assistance in directing them to the place where the Google review has been published. The Second Step Do not respond to the review in a manner that indicates that the person who left the review is lying, is a liar, or that indicates that you are angry with the review. It is best to leave the issue of the review to a later date, after you have first attempted to discuss the publisher’s concerns and attempted to resolve the issue. The Third Step The third step is to either reach out with the person who published the review and to see if you can negotiate with them a resolution with them which resolves the issue, and hopefully, their removal of the Google review or alternatively, that they update it to reflect the outcome and a more positive experience. Unfortunately, however, this may not always be the case, especially when they are a fake, or anonymous, Google review – we will write about those particular types of Google reviews in further detail separately. The Fourth Step If you have attempted to reach out to the person who left the negative Google review and they have not responded, or the negotiations did not result in the desired outcome, you may wish to consider taking legal action against them. This is the step where you will usually require legal advice to send a strongly worded letter or concerns notice to the other person, informing them that they Google review is defamatory, and that if they don’t remove it and take other remedial actions (such as paying compensation), that you will take further legal action, including filing a claim with a court. The Fifth Step If all else fails, that is, if you have tried your best to negotiate, and after those negotiations and discussions fell through, the publisher of the Google review has not adequately complied with your demands within a legal letter or concerns notice, you can then obtain legal advice about commencing a claim in Court. In our experience, this usually has a more forceful effect than steps 1 to 4 above, because there are real and substantial consequences for the publisher of a defamatory Google review at court. Consequences of publishing a defamatory Google review can include significant damage awards, the legal costs of the innocent person (usually the plaintiff) and, if all of those costs cannot be paid, potential bankruptcy for the publisher of a defamatory or negative Google review. How Allen Law can help you If you are the owner of a small or medium sized business in Australia, and your business has a social media or online presence, there is a likelihood that, no matter how hard you try, and no matter how good your services or goods are, it is inevitable that someone will always complain, and that complaint, in the age of modern technology, is usually made in a public forum and online. We have years of experience in representing and advising small to medium sized businesses of public reputation protection and the legal mechanisms and avenues open to them to pursue publishers of negative and defamatory Google reviews, including how to obtain the details of an anonymous publisher of fake reviews. We have successfully obtained for our clients: If you have received a negative or defamatory Google review, we are here to help, and we are competitive on price. Get in touch today. Email:              enquiries@allenlawyers.com.au Phone:             (03) 7020 6563 Whatsapp:      0429 070 261 Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should not rely on this as a substitute for advice from a qualified lawyer. Every case is different, and the law may change. Consult Allen Law for a detailed analysis of your case tailored to your particular set of circumstances.

Read More

BY: root

29 October, 2025 Comments (0)

From Notice to Court: Defamation Lawyers in Melbourne, VIC

If your reputation is under attack, you need clear guidance and strong legal support. At Allen Law in Melbourne, VIC, our team is here to help you protect your name and take action. Call us today on (03) 7020 6563 for confidential advice. Understanding Defamation and Your Rights Defamation occurs when false statements harm your reputation. It can happen in print, online, or through spoken words. The impact can be personal, professional, or both. Our defamation lawyers in Melbourne, VIC, help clients understand their rights and options. We guide you through the process with clarity and care, ensuring you know what to expect at every stage. Taking early action is important. The sooner you seek advice, the sooner we can help protect your reputation, gather evidence, and work towards a resolution that safeguards your future. From Concerns Notice to Court: The Legal Process of a Defamation Claim At Allen Law, we believe in transparency. Here’s how we handle a defamation matter from start to finish: Step 1: Concerns Notice This is the first formal step. We send a written notice to the person or organisation responsible for the defamatory statement. It outlines the false claims, explains why they are harmful, and requests a resolution. Step 2: Response and Negotiation The other party may respond with an offer to retract, apologise, or settle. Our defamation lawyers in Melbourne, VIC, are skilled negotiators who aim to resolve matters quickly and effectively. Step 3: Mediation If direct negotiation does not work, mediation is often the next step. This is a structured discussion led by an independent mediator. It can save time, money, and stress. Step 4: Court Proceedings If no agreement is reached, we prepare your case for court. Our team presents strong evidence and arguments to protect your reputation and secure the best possible outcome. Why Strategic Negotiation Matters Not every defamation case needs to go to trial. In fact, many are resolved through careful negotiation and mediation. This approach can: Reduce legal costs. Save time. Minimise public exposure. Provide faster closure. Our defamation lawyers in Melbourne, VIC, focus on achieving the best result with the least disruption to your life. We combine legal skill with practical strategies to protect your interests. Common Situations Where We Can Help We assist clients facing defamation in many forms, including: Harmful social media posts. False news articles. Damaging online reviews. Workplace rumours. Public speeches or statements. If you are unsure whether your situation qualifies, our defamation lawyers in Melbourne, VIC, can assess your case and explain your options. Why Choose Allen Law? Choosing the right legal team can make all the difference. At Allen Law, we offer: Clear, honest advice from the start. A proven track record in defamation matters. Strong negotiation skills to resolve disputes quickly. Courtroom experience when litigation is necessary. Personalised service tailored to your needs. Our clients trust our defamation lawyers in Melbourne, VIC, to handle sensitive matters with discretion and determination. Taking the First Step If you believe you have been defamed, act quickly. The law sets strict time limits for making a claim. Early action helps preserve evidence and strengthens your position. You can learn more about our services by visiting our page on defamation. Acting promptly also allows our defamation lawyers in Melbourne, VIC, to engage with the other party before the situation escalates further. In many cases, early intervention can lead to a resolution without the need for lengthy court proceedings, saving you time, stress, and costs. How We Work With You From the first consultation, we focus on understanding your goals. Some clients want a public apology. Others want financial compensation. Many want both. We tailor our approach to match your priorities. Our defamation lawyers in Melbourne, VIC, keep you informed at every stage so you can make confident decisions. We also take the time to explain your legal options in plain language, ensuring you fully understand the potential outcomes and risks. This collaborative approach empowers you to make informed choices that align with both your legal rights and personal values. The Benefits of Working With Local Experts As a Melbourne-based firm, we understand the local legal landscape. We know the courts, the procedures, and the strategies that work best here. This local insight, combined with our legal expertise, allows us to deliver effective and efficient results for our clients. Defamation can cause lasting damage to your personal and professional life. Taking action is about more than clearing your name. It is about protecting your future. Our defamation lawyers in Melbourne, VIC, are ready to stand by your side, guide you through the process, and fight for the outcome you deserve. Protect Your Reputation Today, Call Allen Law Your reputation matters. Do not let false statements go unchallenged. Call Allen Law on (03) 7020 6563 or visit our contact page to arrange a confidential consultation. Let us help you take control and move forward with confidence.

Read More

BY: root

29 October, 2025 Comments (0)

Is a cartoon picture of Jabba the Hutt defamatory?

Can a cartoon or a picture be defamatory? Can a cartoon character depicting Jabba the Hutt from Star Wars give rise to an action in defamation? Well, according to His Honour, Morzone DCJ in Hallam v O’Connor and Payne [2024] QDC 187, it most definitely can. As is common in the Australian defamation world, it involved: a plaintiff that was involved in the local government space, namely, the former Chief Executive Officer of the Local Government Association of Queensland; and a defendant who was a former politician. The plaintiff was Mr Greg Hallam, who sued Mr Rob Payne, the fourth defendant, and Ms Lyn O’Connor, the first defendant. The plaintiff obtained judgment against the first defendant who took no steps to set it aside and challenge liability. Accordingly, the question in respect of the first defendant was merely that of the assessment of damages. However, the fourth defendant, Mr Payne, denied liability, and accordingly, His Honour had to determine the question of liability. The publication in question for the purposes of this article is a publication by Mr Payne on Facebook on 21 June 2017 to the following effect – “Thanks to all people supporting a Queensland ICAC. Those in power rarely welcome scrutiny, but the ordinary decent people in government roles (who are often victims) need us to maintain the rage!”. Publication of the above Facebook post by Mr Payne was conceded. All that his Honour was required then, to establish was whether the Facebook post: was of and concerning Mr Hallam; and carried the defamatory imputations pleaded, or similar imputations not differing in substance. There was no requirement for His Honour to determine the issue of serious harm, as the defamatory publications occurred prior to the uniform defamation amendments which took effect on 1 July 2021 in Queensland. Was the Jabba the Hutt caricature post of and concerning the plaintiff? Mr Hallam’s case as to identification was a contextual one, based upon the existence of multiple extrinsic facts. This was because Mr Hallam’s name was not used in any of the five (5) publications Mr Hallam pleaded against Mr Payne. As such, express identification could not be established. Some of the extrinsic facts relied upon to establish that the Facebook post was of and concerning the Mr Hallam included, but were not limited to: Mr Hallam’s physical appearance; that the acronym LGAQ is known in the public domain as being a reference to the Local Government Association of Queensland; and the nature of Mr Payne’s Facebook page, in that, it promoted matters of politics, and thus, would attract a readership that have an interest in politics. His Honour found, in particular at [19] that the caricature of Jabba the Hutt was persuasive evidence of identification, and further reinforced an ordinary reasonable reader to identify the plaintiff by the use of the words “LGAQ” on its shirt. Additionally, Mr Hallam called three (3) witnesses who gave direct evidence that they recognised the Facebook post as being of and concerning him. Accordingly, His Honour found at [25]. That the Facebook post, and the other four (4) pleaded publications (being 2 to 5) did, on the balance of probabilities, identify Mr Hallam. The imputations Mr Hallam pleaded seven (7) imputations said to have arose out of the Facebook post. They were as follows: the plaintiff was a powerful crime boss; and further and alternatively, the plaintiff operated through the LGAQ as a cartel, a profitable criminal empire; and further and alternatively, the plaintiff was corrupt; and further and alternatively, the plaintiff sought to corruptly influence public officials including elected members of the Queensland Parliament; and further and alternatively, the plaintiff had overborne the ethical standards which the LGAQ should have provided to local government; and further and alternatively, the plaintiff as the CEO of the LGAQ, did not welcome appropriate scrutiny of himself or the LGAQ; and further and alternatively, the plaintiff as CEO of the LGAQ, contributed to ordinary decent people in government roles becoming victims by the misuse of power. His Honour found that: imputations (a) and (b) were not made out, as it would require an unreasonable interpretation, by the ordinary, reasonable reader, with knowledge of the Jabba the Hutt character, to reach that conclusion. imputations (c) and (d) were capable of being conveyed, and were conveyed, by the use of the words ‘ICAC’ within the Facebook post, being understood by the ordinary, reasonable reader as a reference to the Independent Commission Against Corruption; and that the remaining imputations (e), (f) and (g) were made out for, amongst other reasons, the symbolism of the chain used in the caricature, the use of the words ‘victim’ and ‘those in power rarely welcome increased scrutiny’ (as applicable). Damages A good part of the judgment concerned the assessment of general, aggravated and special damages. His Honour assessed damages as against the fourth defendant as follows: General Damages:                               $100,000.00 Aggravated Damages:                       $25,000.00 Special Damages:                                 $3,798.00 Interest on General Damages:       $27,675.53 Interest on Special Damages:        $805.38 Total:                                                              $157,260.91 Got a question about defamation? Allen Law has significant experience in the law of defamation, and can provide you with a full suite of services, from initial, detailed written advice, to concerns notices and detailed responses if you’ve been served with a concerns notice. Even better yet, we will beat any price in accordance with our price beat guarantee policy. Get in touch today, to see how we can help. Phone:             (03) 7020 6563Email:               enquiries@allenlawyers.com.auWebsite:          www.allenlawyers.com.au Disclaimer: This article is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. Please contact Allen Law for

Read More

BY: root

29 October, 2025 Comments (0)

Publication & Defamation Law in Australia

Publication & Defamation Law in Australia As previously discussed in our article What is Defamation?, a plaintiff commencing a defamation claim in Australia must establish four essential elements. One of the most critical—and usually the first to consider—is publication. In defamation law, publication refers to the communication of defamatory material to someone other than the person it is about. This article explores in detail how publication is defined, how it occurs, and what evidence is needed to prove it in different contexts, including oral defamation, written defamation, and other less common forms. What Is Publication in Defamation Law? In all Australian jurisdictions, for a statement to be considered defamatory, it must be published to a third party. This is a fundamental element of the tort of defamation and must be proven for a claim to succeed. Put simply, a defamatory statement must be seen, heard, or otherwise received by someone other than the plaintiff. The courts require evidence that a third party had access to and comprehended the defamatory matter in question. Although publication is generally considered the most straightforward element to prove, there are scenarios where it becomes complex—particularly when the publication is alleged to have occurred in private conversations or through limited circulation. Establishing Publication: Types of Defamation and Required Evidence The type of evidence needed to prove publication depends heavily on the form of the defamatory matter. Below, we examine common categories: oral defamation, written defamation, and other forms. Oral Defamation Oral defamation, often referred to as slander, involves spoken words. This is typically the most challenging type of defamation to prove due to several practical and legal hurdles: Most defamatory conversations are not recorded. Even when recorded, such recordings are often inadmissible in court. For example, under section 6 of the Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic), recording a private conversation without consent may be illegal, and therefore, inadmissible. Human memory is fallible, especially with time – witnesses may forget details or misremember exactly what was said or when it was said. To prove oral publication, a claimant must rely on third-party witnesses who heard the defamatory statement being made. These individuals must be willing to provide a written statement and, ideally, give evidence in court or be available for subpoena. Written Defamation The majority of defamation claims in Australia involve written statements—also known as libel. Written defamation is easier to prove than oral defamation because there is typically a tangible record of the defamatory content. In modern contexts, written defamation often appears on: Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and WhatsApp Emails and text messages Blogs, forums, and websites Printed materials, including newspapers and magazines Importantly, for publication to be valid, at least one recipient must be capable of understanding the language in which the content is published. For instance, if defamatory content is published in Indonesian, and none of the recipients understands Indonesian, then no publication has occurred. However, if even one recipient can comprehend it and did comprehend it, that satisfies the requirement. In high-profile cases, such as those involving media outlets, publication typically includes broadcast via television, radio, or digital news platforms. Sometimes, publication can be presumed or is otherwise not in dispute. This is usually the case involving mass media publications via television or radio. Other Forms of Defamatory Publication Less common but recognised forms of defamatory publication include: Theatrical performances or plays Artworks or visual representations Cartoons or illustrations These mediums are rarely the subject of defamation claims because they are often viewed as subjective or artistic interpretations, which may not carry a specific, defamatory meaning in the same way that precise words do. Nonetheless, they can still constitute defamation if the material clearly implies a defamatory imputation and is understood as such by a third party. How Allen Law Can Help At Allen Law, we specialise in defamation law across Australia, including cases involving complex questions of publication. If you believe you have been defamed, or if you have received a concerns notice or are defending a defamation claim, it is critical to obtain legal advice without delay. We will help you: Determine whether publication has occurred Identify and secure witnesses or documentary evidence Comply with procedural requirements Prepare and present your case, whether you’re the plaintiff or the defendant Our legal team has experience dealing with both everyday defamation (e.g., on social media) and large-scale, high-profile media litigation. Contact Allen Law Phone: (03) 7020 6563Email: enquiries@allenlawyers.com.auWebsite: www.allenlawyers.com.au Speak to a defamation lawyer at Allen Law today for practical, fast, and strategic legal advice. Disclaimer: This article is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with a qualified defamation lawyer regarding your specific circumstances, as the law may and does change.

Read More

BY: root

29 October, 2025 Comments (0)

Serious Harm & Defamation Law in Australia

Defamation & Serious Harm In the world of defamation law, one of the most significant recent developments in Victoria and other parts of Australia is the introduction of the “serious harm” element. This requirement fundamentally reshapes how defamation claims are assessed, filtering out trivial or unmeritorious cases at an early stage. If you are considering a defamation claim, or defending against one, understanding the legal test of serious harm is essential. At Allen Law, we are experts in defamation law in Victoria, and we are here to guide you through what the serious harm threshold means and how it applies to your circumstances. What Is the Serious Harm Element? As of 1 July 2021, the law of defamation in Victoria includes an additional statutory hurdle: the plaintiff must prove that the publication of defamatory matter has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. This requirement is set out in section 10A of the Defamation Act 2005 (Vic), introduced by the Defamation (Model Provisions) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2020 (Vic). The provision reads: “It is an element of a cause of action for defamation that the publication of the defamatory matter has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to the reputation of the person.” This legislative reform aligns Victoria with jurisdictions such as New South Wales, Queensland and South Australia, which have also adopted the serious harm threshold. Purpose of the Serious Harm Test The serious harm requirement is designed to: Prevent minor or trivial claims from proceeding to trial Reduce the burden on the courts and defendants Ensure that only genuinely damaging defamation claims proceed to court In doing so, the reform strikes a balance between protecting reputation and ensuring freedom of expression, especially in the digital age, where social media has amplified the spread of casual, often reckless, commentary. When and How Is Serious Harm Assessed? The serious harm element can be assessed at various stages of a defamation proceeding, but most commonly it is raised by a defendant early in the litigation, by way of a preliminary determination application. Courts may decide to deal with the issue as a threshold question—before dealing with any other substantive issues in the claim—through a summary dismissal or interlocutory hearing. If the plaintiff fails to establish serious harm, the claim is dismissed at that stage, sparing both parties the cost and time associated with proceeding to a trial. This assessment typically considers: The content, tone, and reach of the defamatory publication The context in which the matter was published The audience size and demographic Any actual consequences suffered by the plaintiff, such as reputational damage, emotional distress, job loss, or social exclusion Key Case Law: Serious Harm in Action Australian courts have begun applying the serious harm test in line with UK precedent, particularly the landmark UK Supreme Court case of Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2015] EWHC 2242 (QB). The Lachaux decision confirmed that serious harm is a fact-based inquiry, requiring more than just the publication of defamatory words. Lachaux has been applied in many Australian cases since the introduction of the serious harm element. See, for example, Whittington v Newman[2024] NSWCA 27. Evidence Required to Prove Serious Harm To meet the serious harm threshold, plaintiffs are advised to present tangible and credible evidence, which may include: Witness testimony that their opinion of the plaintiff has been lowered Loss of business, employment, or professional opportunities Social media metrics indicating wide dissemination Psychiatric or medical evidence (in some cases) Generalised claims about damage to reputation will no longer suffice. Plaintiffs must demonstrate actual or likely reputational damage that goes beyond mere embarrassment or hurt to individual feelings. Serious Harm and Social Media Defamation A common context for modern defamation claims is social media—platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and messaging apps like WhatsApp. Courts have shown a willingness to consider the reach and permanence of social media posts when determining whether serious harm has occurred. However, a social media post seen by only a handful of people, with limited engagement, may not meet the threshold—even if the statement is clearly defamatory. If you’re concerned about online defamation, Allen Law can assist with assessing whether a viable claim exists under the serious harm standard and advise on whether to pursue takedown notices, letters of demand, or formal litigation. Can Serious Harm Be Presumed? No. Under the new regime, serious harm is not presumed. Plaintiffs must plead and prove the element. This marks a departure from the earlier position under common law, where defamatory statements were presumed to cause harm unless proven otherwise. This change enhances the burden on plaintiffs and requires more strategic, evidence-based preparation before commencing court proceedings. Implications for Defendants For defendants, the serious harm test presents a powerful early defence tool. If a plaintiff cannot establish serious harm, the defendant can apply for the matter to be dismissed early, saving legal costs and reputational risk. Defamation defence strategies now often include challenging the serious harm threshold at the outset. Why Legal Advice Is Essential Because the serious harm element adds a complex new layer to defamation litigation, it is vital to obtain early, informed legal advice—whether you are pursuing or defending a claim. At Allen Law, we specialise in defamation claims across Victoria and are highly experienced in navigating the serious harm threshold. We can help you: Evaluate the viability of a defamation claim Collect and assess the evidence needed to prove (or refute) serious harm Represent you in court during preliminary hearings or trials Resolve disputes before they escalate through strategic negotiations Contact Allen Law for Expert Defamation Advice Whether you’ve been defamed, served with a concerns notice, or are navigating a social media controversy, Allen Law is ready to act swiftly and decisively to protect your legal and reputational interests. Phone: (03) 7020 6563Email: enquiries@allenlawyers.com.auWebsite: www.allenlawyers.com.au Disclaimer: This article is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult with a qualified defamation lawyer regarding your specific circumstances.

Read More

BY: root

29 October, 2025 Comments (0)

Concerns Notices in Australian Defamation Law: What You Need to Know

If you’ve been defamed in Australia, in most jurisdictions, your first step is not heading straight to court—but issuing a Concerns Notice. At Allen Law, we are experts in defamation and reputation protection. Based in Melbourne, we regularly help individuals and businesses navigate the complexities of Australia’s defamation law, including drafting compliant and strategically sound concerns notices. This guide explains what concerns notices are, why they matter, what legal requirements they must meet, and how Allen Law can help. What Is a Concerns Notice? A concerns notice is a formal, written document sent to the person or organisation that made a potentially defamatory statement. It informs them of: Its purpose is to give the publisher an opportunity to resolve the issue before litigation begins. Is a Concerns Notice Mandatory? Yes, in most parts of Australia—including Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania—you must issue a concerns notice before commencing court proceedings for defamation. This requirement is outlined in Section 12B of the Defamation Act 2005. You must then wait at least 28 days after serving the notice before you can commence proceedings. Failing to follow this step can result in your claim being struck out. Note: Western Australia and the Northern Territory currently do not require a concerns notice, but this may change with future legislative updates. Legal Requirements for a Valid Concerns Notice A concerns notice is not just a letter of complaint—it must meet strict legal standards. Under Section 12A of the Act, your concerns notice must: Be in WritingOral requests or informal communication do not meet the statutory requirement. The concerns notice must be a properly structured written document. Identify Where the Defamatory Material AppearsYou must clearly indicate where the defamatory content was published. This could include: Precise URLs or physical publication details should be included. List the Defamatory ImputationsYou must state what defamatory meanings (or imputations) are conveyed by the material. For example: Describe the HarmYou must outline the serious harm caused or likely to be caused to your reputation. For individuals, this means personal harm. For companies, this generally refers to serious financial harm. Attach the Defamatory Content (If Practicable)If you can obtain a copy of the publication, you should attach it. However, if the defamation was spoken (e.g. in a conversation or phone call) and no recording exists, it may not be reasonably practicable to attach anything. Why It’s Critical to Get the Concerns Notice Right Many people attempt to draft concerns notices themselves, only to make errors that undermine their case. Even minor technical defects can lead to: At Allen Law, we’ve seen it all—from notices with vague claims to ones that don’t cite the correct publication. A well-drafted concerns notice can mean the difference between a quick resolution and a drawn-out court battle. Allen Law’s Fixed Fee and Price Beat Guarantee We offer: We believe in transparency, value, and exceptional legal work. Need Help With a Concerns Notice? Allen Law is one of Melbourne’s most experienced defamation law firms. We understand the nuance of both protecting and restoring reputations. We handle everything from simple takedown requests to complex litigation. Phone: (03) 7020 6563Email: lee@allenlawyers.com.auWebsite: www.allenlawyers.com.au Why Clients Trust Allen Law: ⚖️ Legal Disclaimer: This article provides general information and is not legal advice. You should not rely on it as a substitute for legal advice tailored to your specific situation.

Read More

BY: root

29 October, 2025 Comments (0)

Defamation and Offensive Language: Does Vulgar Abuse Count?

Can calling someone an idiot, moron, or worse amount to defamation in Australia? With the rise of social media, this question is more relevant than ever. At Allen Law, Melbourne’s go-to defamation lawyers, we often advise clients on whether crude or abusive language—particularly when posted online—crosses the line into defamation. Vulgar Abuse vs Defamation: What’s the Difference? In the cult sci-fi comedy Red Dwarf, Arnold Rimmer once quipped,“You’re about as much use as a condom machine in the Vatican.”It’s colourful, creative, and obviously insulting. But is it defamatory? The key legal question is not whether a statement is offensive, but whether it lowers someone’s reputation in the eyes of a reasonable member of the community. What the Courts Say In Gaynor v Burns (No 2) [2015] NSWDC 283, Gibson DCJ observed that claims of “vulgar abuse” have become more common due to the raw and intemperate tone of social media. Still, the law remains clear: abuse alone is not enough. “Claims of “vulgar abuse” were so rare that Mundey, the leading case on this issue, remained unreported for some years after it was handed down. Its increase in popularity in recent times owes much to the colour and intemperate language that is the hallmark of Internet blogs and social media, as more than one judge has observed.” As a general rule, the use of expletives, insults, or offensive language does not automatically amount to defamation.Just because something hurts your pride does not mean it harms your reputation in the legal sense. Key Principle: A statement is only defamatory if it damages your reputation in the minds of others—not just if it offends or angers you. Case Law Examples Polias v Ryall [2013] NSWSC 1267 Mr Nicholas Polias sued over the following comment: “Lol nick is fking stupid. His mother is fking stupid. What a dumb b*tch. How are people like this allowed to breed? Disgraceful, good riddance to bad shit. Nick you should be ashamed of yourself, for the human being you are.” Although clearly insulting, the Court found the statement lacked any real defamatory meaning and struck it out. Kermani v Seervai [2017] NSWDC 449 Plaintiffs claimed defamation from this colourful phrase: “…Farida Irani (queen bee), MC Marfatia (Terminator), Ruzbeh Desai (the A licker)… got their asses kicked at the AGM…” The Court ruled the phrases, though offensive and arguably juvenile, did not convey any defamatory meaning when viewed in their broader context. So, Is It Defamation or Just Abuse? Under Australian defamation law, context matters.The same words might be defamatory in one setting, but harmless banter in another.Legal analysis of whether a statement crosses the line requires expert evaluation. If you’ve been on the receiving end of an offensive, vulgar, or insulting comment—especially online—and are unsure whether you can sue for defamation, Allen Law can help. Contact Melbourne’s Leading Defamation Lawyers At Allen Law, we bring clarity to complex questions of language, reputation, and legal rights.We know defamation law inside out, and we fight hard to protect your name. Email: lee@allenlawyers.com.auPhone: (03) 7020 6563Website: www.allenlawyers.com.au Disclaimer This article is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. For tailored advice on your individual circumstances, contact a qualified legal practitioner.

Read More

BY: root

29 October, 2025 Comments (0)

Understanding Limitation Periods in Defamation Claims

If you believe your reputation has been damaged by defamatory material—whether in print, online, broadcast, or spoken form—it’s essential to act fast. At Allen Law, we are experts in defamation law and understand that one of the most critical elements of a successful defamation claim in Australia is timing. Why Time Is Crucial in Defamation Proceedings Under Australian law, the limitation period for defamation claims is strictly one (1) year from the date of publication of the defamatory material. This short timeframe makes it vital to seek legal advice as soon as you become aware of a potentially defamatory statement. Unlike other areas of civil litigation, defamation law involves complex pre-action steps. A failure to comply with these mandatory procedures—such as serving a concerns notice—can result in your case being struck out by the court. Delays can lead to unnecessary costs, wasted time, and, ultimately, the loss of your legal rights. At Allen Law, we are experienced in navigating these pre-litigation requirements and acting swiftly to protect your interests. What Is Considered ‘Publication’? The one-year clock begins from the date of publication, but understanding what constitutes “publication” is not always straightforward. It may involve: Often, defamatory material is published online, where it can be modified, shared, or re-published. Each of these actions may trigger a new cause of action depending on the circumstances. Determining the actual date of publication can be legally complex—and this is why early legal intervention is key. Can the Limitation Period Be Extended? Yes, but only in exceptional circumstances. Australian defamation laws allow the courts to grant an extension of the limitation period to a maximum of three (3) years, but this is not automatic. The plaintiff must demonstrate that it was not reasonable to commence proceedings within the original 12-month period. Courts will consider various factors, including: One recent example that highlights how courts handle time extension applications is the high-profile case of Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Ltd (Limitation Extension) [2023] FCA 375. Case Study: Lehrmann v Network Ten Bruce Lehrmann sought to sue Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson for defamation following an episode of The Project broadcast in February 2021. However, his defamation proceedings were filed outside the standard 12-month window. The Federal Court granted an extension of time, acknowledging that it would not have been reasonable for Lehrmann to commence a defamation suit while criminal charges were pending regarding the same allegations. Pursuing civil litigation during active criminal proceedings would have potentially prejudiced his defence, especially since a defendant in a criminal case cannot be compelled to give evidence unless they choose to. While Lehrmann was ultimately unsuccessful in his defamation claim, his successful time extension application underlines that courts will make allowances in exceptional and complex legal circumstances. Still, it is important to note that such extensions are rare and require careful legal strategy. At Allen Law, we offer expert guidance to help you assess whether your circumstances may justify an extension of time. What You Should Do If You Believe You’ve Been Defamed If you suspect that you have been defamed—whether through media, social media, or other publication—you should: We at Allen Law offer prompt, strategic advice in defamation matters and understand the urgency and sensitivity required. Why Choose Allen Law for Defamation Claims Allen Law is a modern, expert litigation firm with a deep focus on reputation law, including both personal and corporate defamation. Whether you are an individual whose reputation has been harmed or a business falsely accused in public forums, we help you understand your rights and act decisively. Our legal team provides: Contact Us Today – Don’t Delay Don’t risk your legal rights by delaying action. If you need help with a defamation matter or want advice on an extension of time application, contact us now: Email: lee@allenlawyers.com.auPhone: (03) 7020 6563Web: www.allenlawyers.com.au Your reputation matters. Allen Law is here to help you protect it—swiftly, strategically, and effectively. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should not rely on this as a substitute for advice from a qualified lawyer. Every case is different, and the law may change.

Read More

BY: root

29 October, 2025 Comments (0)

Defamatory Google reviews

Defamatory Google Reviews Online reviews can make or break a business. But what happens when a customer leaves a scathing review full of lies, or a competitor pretends to be a client and slanders your name? Can you sue them? At Allen Law, we get asked this question a lot. The short answer is: yes – you can sue for a bad review in Australia, but only in specific circumstances. Here’s what you need to know. Not Every Bad Review Is Defamation A review that says something like “The food was cold and the service was slow”  is typically an opinion, and in most cases, opinion is protected under Australian law. However, a review may be considered defamatory if it: Carries or conveys a meaning that is defamatory Clearly identifies your business Causes or is likely to cause serious harm to your reputation or revenue In these cases, you may have a valid defamation claim. What Counts as Defamation in a Review? To sue for defamation in Australia, your business must prove: Publication – The review was posted online and seen by at least one other person Identification – Your business is clearly identifiable in the post, even if not named directly Defamatory meaning – The review includes statements that lower your business in the eyes of others Serious harm – The content has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to your business’s reputation Example: A review falsely stating, “This accountant committed fraud and charged me for services I never used,” likely meets the legal threshold for defamation. It goes beyond opinion – it makes a damaging, false accusation. Fake Reviews: A Growing Problem Fake reviews are becoming a serious issue; whether they come from competitors, disgruntled ex-employees, or anonymous bots. If you suspect a review is fake: Take a screenshot of the review Report it to the platform (e.g. Google, Facebook) Do not respond emotionally or aggressively Contact Allen Law for strategic legal advice—we may issue a Concerns Notice or seek a court-ordered takedown Your Legal Options: What You Can Do 1. Send a Concerns Notice A formal legal notice that gives the reviewer an opportunity to retract or amend their review and issue an apology. This is often the most effective first step. 2. Negotiate a Settlement We can often negotiate compensation or a written retraction, avoiding court. 3. Take Court Action If the harm is substantial and the reviewer is uncooperative, litigation may be appropriate. At Allen Law, we’ve successfully pursued bold and strategic litigation when needed. 4. Get the Review Taken Down We may be able to work with platforms like Google to remove defamatory content. But Isn’t It Risky to Sue? There are risks involved in suing for defamation: You’ll need to prove serious harm The reviewer may rely on defences like truth or honest opinion Legal costs can be high (though potential damages may also be substantial) That’s why we recommend court action only when the stakes are high—your livelihood, reputation, and credibility. Prevention Tips: Protect Your Reputation Online Claim and monitor your Google Business Profile Stay calm and professional in review responses Consult a lawyer before responding to potentially defamatory content Set up Google Alerts to track your business name online When in Doubt, Lawyer Up At Allen Law, we’ve helped countless Melbourne and Victorian business owners remove fake reviews, respond strategically, and protect their professional reputations. Don’t let one malicious review undo years of hard work. If you think you’ve been defamed, speak to us today. Email: enquiries@allenlawyers.com.auPhone: (03) 7020 6563Website: www.allenlawyers.com.au Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Defamation law is complex. Please consult a qualified legal professional before taking action.

Read More

BY: root

29 October, 2025 Comments (0)

What Is Defamation?

Pre-Publication Legal Advice If you’re a journalist, business, influencer, or publisher preparing to release sensitive content, it’s wise to get legal advice before publication. At Allen Law, we help individuals and organisations: Review high-risk content Avoid liability for defamatory publication Minimise potential fallout through risk assessment and mitigation   Why Choose Allen Law for Defamation Matters Proven Expertise – We are Melbourne’s bold and effective voice in defamation law. Client-Focused Service – Strategic, accessible, and committed to your outcome. Courtroom-Ready – We are not afraid to litigate when necessary. Plain English Advice – No jargon, just clear and practical guidance. Speak With a Defamation Lawyer Today Whether you’ve been targeted by false allegations or want to understand your publishing risks, Allen Law is here to help. Email: enquiries@allenlawyers.com.auPhone: (03) 7020 6563Website: www.allenlawyers.com.au Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. For tailored legal advice, please consult a qualified legal professional. Allen Law accepts no responsibility for loss arising from reliance on this content. Note: Western Australia (WA) and the Northern Territory (NT) have not adopted the 2021 “serious harm” threshold reforms. In these jurisdictions, reputational harm is presumed. Each defence is fact-specific and complex. If you’re facing or considering a defamation claim, legal advice is essential. Digital Defamation: A Growing Risk Online defamation is now among the most common types of defamation claims in Australia. Content shared on the internet spreads fast and widely, especially on platforms like: Facebook Instagram TikTok Twitter/X Google Reviews Blogs and forums Important: Sharing or republishing defamatory content—whether or not you created it—can still make you legally liable. What To Do If You’ve Been Defamed If you believe you’ve been defamed, act quickly. Under Australian law, you generally have 12 months from the date of publication to make a claim. Acting early increases your chances of resolution. Common steps include: Issuing a Concerns Notice to the publisher Requesting a public retraction or apology Negotiating damages or a settlement Pre-Publication Legal Advice If you’re a journalist, business, influencer, or publisher preparing to release sensitive content, it’s wise to get legal advice before publication. At Allen Law, we help individuals and organisations: Review high-risk content Avoid liability for defamatory publication Minimise potential fallout through risk assessment and mitigation   Why Choose Allen Law for Defamation Matters Proven Expertise – We are Melbourne’s bold and effective voice in defamation law. Client-Focused Service – Strategic, accessible, and committed to your outcome. Courtroom-Ready – We are not afraid to litigate when necessary. Plain English Advice – No jargon, just clear and practical guidance. Speak With a Defamation Lawyer Today Whether you’ve been targeted by false allegations or want to understand your publishing risks, Allen Law is here to help. Email: enquiries@allenlawyers.com.auPhone: (03) 7020 6563Website: www.allenlawyers.com.au Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. For tailored legal advice, please consult a qualified legal professional. Allen Law accepts no responsibility for loss arising from reliance on this content. Note: Western Australia (WA) and the Northern Territory (NT) have not adopted the 2021 “serious harm” threshold reforms. In these jurisdictions, reputational harm is presumed. Each defence is fact-specific and complex. If you’re facing or considering a defamation claim, legal advice is essential. Digital Defamation: A Growing Risk Online defamation is now among the most common types of defamation claims in Australia. Content shared on the internet spreads fast and widely, especially on platforms like: Facebook Instagram TikTok Twitter/X Google Reviews Blogs and forums Important: Sharing or republishing defamatory content—whether or not you created it—can still make you legally liable. What To Do If You’ve Been Defamed If you believe you’ve been defamed, act quickly. Under Australian law, you generally have 12 months from the date of publication to make a claim. Acting early increases your chances of resolution. Common steps include: Issuing a Concerns Notice to the publisher Requesting a public retraction or apology Negotiating damages or a settlement Pre-Publication Legal Advice If you’re a journalist, business, influencer, or publisher preparing to release sensitive content, it’s wise to get legal advice before publication. At Allen Law, we help individuals and organisations: Review high-risk content Avoid liability for defamatory publication Minimise potential fallout through risk assessment and mitigation   Why Choose Allen Law for Defamation Matters Proven Expertise – We are Melbourne’s bold and effective voice in defamation law. Client-Focused Service – Strategic, accessible, and committed to your outcome. Courtroom-Ready – We are not afraid to litigate when necessary. Plain English Advice – No jargon, just clear and practical guidance. Speak With a Defamation Lawyer Today Whether you’ve been targeted by false allegations or want to understand your publishing risks, Allen Law is here to help. Email: enquiries@allenlawyers.com.auPhone: (03) 7020 6563Website: www.allenlawyers.com.au Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. For tailored legal advice, please consult a qualified legal professional. Allen Law accepts no responsibility for loss arising from reliance on this content. Note: Western Australia (WA) and the Northern Territory (NT) have not adopted the 2021 “serious harm” threshold reforms. In these jurisdictions, reputational harm is presumed. Protect a person’s reputation from harm while balancing this against the right to freedom of expression. While freedom of speech is a vital right, it does not extend to publishing false statements that damage others. When someone’s reputation is unfairly harmed by a public statement, defamation law provides remedies—such as damages, retractions, apologies, or injunctions. Key Elements of a Defamation Claim in Australia To establish a successful defamation claim, the plaintiff must prove: 1. Publication The material must be communicated to at least one person other than the plaintiff. This includes traditional and digital media: print, online articles, emails, podcasts, social media posts, comments, and even memes. 2. Identification The plaintiff must be identifiable in the material—either directly by name or indirectly through description, context, or inference. 3. Defamatory Meaning (Imputation) The content must carry a meaning (known as an imputation) that harms the plaintiff’s reputation, exposes them to hatred or ridicule, or

Read More